27UQ850-W Monitor
IPS Black · 27" · 4K · 60Hz · 5ms
MSRP
MEG 342C
QD-OLED · 34" · 3440×1440 · 175Hz · 0.03ms
MSRP
Our verdict
The MEG 342C takes the performance lead with a 29% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.
However, the MEG 342C tells a compelling value story. At $800 versus the 27UQ850-W Monitor's $400 price tag, it costs $400 less while delivering performance that's only 29% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.
Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the MEG 342C is the smarter purchase. The 27UQ850-W Monitor only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.
Performance winner
MEG 342C
29% faster overall
Best value for money
MEG 342C
3% better value per dollar
27UQ850-W Monitor best for
Value for money
3% better value per dollar
Connectivity
Display
Image Quality
Performance
Physical
Frequently asked questions
Is the MEG 342C worth $400 more than the 27UQ850-W Monitor?
It depends on your needs. The MEG 342C scores 84 overall vs 65 for the 27UQ850-W Monitor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the 27UQ850-W Monitor offers better value.
Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the 27UQ850-W Monitor or MEG 342C?
The MEG 342C delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The MEG 342C provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the 27UQ850-W Monitor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.
Can the 27UQ850-W Monitor handle 4K gaming?
The 27UQ850-W Monitor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the MEG 342C is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.
Which should I buy, the 27UQ850-W Monitor or MEG 342C?
Choose the 27UQ850-W Monitor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the MEG 342C if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.
Related comparisons
27UQ850-W Monitor VS 27UK850-W Monitor
Score 65 VS 64
MEG 342C VS 27UK850-W Monitor
Score 84 VS 64
27UQ850-W Monitor VS ProArt PA279CRV Monitor
Score 65 VS 68
MEG 342C VS ProArt PA279CRV Monitor
Score 84 VS 68
27UQ850-W Monitor VS S3225QC Monitor
Score 65 VS 62
MEG 342C VS S3225QC Monitor
Score 84 VS 62
27UQ850-W Monitor VS U2724D Monitor
Score 65 VS 68
MEG 342C VS U2724D Monitor
Score 84 VS 68