70

PD2706UA Monitor

IPS · 27" · 4K · 60Hz · 5ms

$500

MSRP

84

MEG 342C

QD-OLED · 34" · 3440×1440 · 175Hz · 0.03ms

$800

MSRP

Our verdict

The MEG 342C takes the performance lead with a 20% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.

However, the MEG 342C tells a compelling value story. At $800 versus the PD2706UA Monitor's $500 price tag, it costs $300 less while delivering performance that's only 20% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.

Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the MEG 342C is the smarter purchase. The PD2706UA Monitor only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.

Performance winner

MEG 342C

20% faster overall

Best value for money

MEG 342C

15% better value per dollar

PD2706UA Monitor best for

Power efficiency

15% better value per dollar

Connectivity

HDMI
1× HDMI 2.0
2× HDMI 2.1
USB-C
1× USB-C (65W PD)
1× USB-C (15W)

Display

Panel Type
IPS
QD-OLED
Screen Size
27"
34"
Resolution
3840×2160
3440×1440
Pixel Density
163 PPI
110 PPI

Image Quality

Peak Brightness
400 nits
1000 nits
Contrast Ratio
1000:1
Infinite
DCI-P3 Coverage
98%
99%
HDR
HDR400
HDR True Black 400

Performance

Refresh Rate
60 Hz
175 Hz
Response Time
5.0 ms
0.03 ms
Input Lag
10 ms
4 ms

Physical

Weight
6.0 kg
7.0 kg

Frequently asked questions

Is the MEG 342C worth $300 more than the PD2706UA Monitor?

It depends on your needs. The MEG 342C scores 84 overall vs 70 for the PD2706UA Monitor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the PD2706UA Monitor offers better value.

Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the PD2706UA Monitor or MEG 342C?

The MEG 342C delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The MEG 342C provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the PD2706UA Monitor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.

Can the PD2706UA Monitor handle 4K gaming?

The PD2706UA Monitor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the MEG 342C is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.

Which should I buy, the PD2706UA Monitor or MEG 342C?

Choose the PD2706UA Monitor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the MEG 342C if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.

Related comparisons