85

Q27G3XMN Monitor

W-OLED · 27" · 1440p · 240Hz · 0.03ms

$550

MSRP

84

MEG 342C

QD-OLED · 34" · 3440×1440 · 175Hz · 0.03ms

$800

MSRP

Our verdict

The Q27G3XMN Monitor takes the performance lead with a 1% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.

However, the Q27G3XMN Monitor tells a compelling value story. At $550 versus the MEG 342C's $800 price tag, it costs 45% less while delivering performance that's only 1% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.

Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the Q27G3XMN Monitor is the smarter purchase. The MEG 342C only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.

Performance winner

Q27G3XMN Monitor

1% faster overall

Best value for money

Q27G3XMN Monitor

13% better value per dollar

Q27G3XMN Monitor best for

Power efficiency

1% faster overall

Connectivity

HDMI
2× HDMI 2.0
2× HDMI 2.1
USB-C
None
1× USB-C (15W)

Display

Panel Type
W-OLED
QD-OLED
Screen Size
27"
34"
Resolution
2560×1440
3440×1440
Pixel Density
109 PPI
110 PPI

Image Quality

Peak Brightness
800 nits
1000 nits
Contrast Ratio
Infinite
Infinite
DCI-P3 Coverage
98%
99%
HDR
HDR True Black 400
HDR True Black 400

Performance

Refresh Rate
240 Hz
175 Hz
Response Time
0.03 ms
0.03 ms
Input Lag
3 ms
4 ms

Physical

Weight
5.4 kg
7.0 kg

Frequently asked questions

Is the MEG 342C worth $250 more than the Q27G3XMN Monitor?

It depends on your needs. The MEG 342C scores 85 overall vs 84 for the Q27G3XMN Monitor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the Q27G3XMN Monitor offers better value.

Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the Q27G3XMN Monitor or MEG 342C?

The Q27G3XMN Monitor delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The Q27G3XMN Monitor provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the MEG 342C still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.

Can the MEG 342C handle 4K gaming?

The MEG 342C can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the Q27G3XMN Monitor is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.

Which should I buy, the Q27G3XMN Monitor or MEG 342C?

Choose the Q27G3XMN Monitor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the MEG 342C if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.

Related comparisons