62

S3225QC Monitor

VA · 32" · 4K · 60Hz · 4ms

$300

MSRP

65

27UQ850-W Monitor

IPS Black · 27" · 4K · 60Hz · 5ms

$400

MSRP

Our verdict

The 27UQ850-W Monitor takes the performance lead with a 5% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.

However, the S3225QC Monitor tells a compelling value story. At $300 versus the 27UQ850-W Monitor's $400 price tag, it costs 33% less while delivering performance that's only 5% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.

Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the S3225QC Monitor is the smarter purchase. The 27UQ850-W Monitor only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.

Performance winner

27UQ850-W Monitor

5% faster overall

Best value for money

S3225QC Monitor

16% better value per dollar

S3225QC Monitor best for

Value for money

16% better value per dollar

Connectivity

HDMI
2× HDMI 2.1
2× HDMI 2.0
USB-C
1× USB-C (65W PD)
1× USB-C (96W PD)

Display

Panel Type
VA
IPS Black
Screen Size
32"
27"
Resolution
3840×2160
3840×2160
Pixel Density
138 PPI
163 PPI

Image Quality

Peak Brightness
350 nits
400 nits
Contrast Ratio
3000:1
2000:1
DCI-P3 Coverage
90%
95%
HDR
HDR400
HDR400

Performance

Refresh Rate
60 Hz
60 Hz
Response Time
4.0 ms
5.0 ms
Input Lag
9 ms
10 ms

Physical

Weight
7.5 kg
6.2 kg

Frequently asked questions

Is the 27UQ850-W Monitor worth $100 more than the S3225QC Monitor?

It depends on your needs. The 27UQ850-W Monitor scores 65 overall vs 62 for the S3225QC Monitor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the S3225QC Monitor offers better value.

Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the S3225QC Monitor or 27UQ850-W Monitor?

The 27UQ850-W Monitor delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The 27UQ850-W Monitor provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the S3225QC Monitor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.

Can the S3225QC Monitor handle 4K gaming?

The S3225QC Monitor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the 27UQ850-W Monitor is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.

Which should I buy, the S3225QC Monitor or 27UQ850-W Monitor?

Choose the S3225QC Monitor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the 27UQ850-W Monitor if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.

Related comparisons