70

Nitro XV271U Monitor

IPS · 27" · 1440p · 180Hz · 1ms

$230

MSRP

62

S3225QC Monitor

VA · 32" · 4K · 60Hz · 4ms

$300

MSRP

Our verdict

The Nitro XV271U Monitor takes the performance lead with a 13% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.

However, the Nitro XV271U Monitor tells a compelling value story. At $230 versus the S3225QC Monitor's $300 price tag, it costs 30% less while delivering performance that's only 13% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.

Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the Nitro XV271U Monitor is the smarter purchase. The S3225QC Monitor only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.

Performance winner

Nitro XV271U Monitor

13% faster overall

Best value for money

Nitro XV271U Monitor

5% better value per dollar

Nitro XV271U Monitor best for

Raw performance

13% faster overall

Connectivity

HDMI
2× HDMI 2.0
2× HDMI 2.1
USB-C
None
1× USB-C (65W PD)

Display

Panel Type
IPS
VA
Screen Size
27"
32"
Resolution
2560×1440
3840×2160
Pixel Density
109 PPI
138 PPI

Image Quality

Peak Brightness
400 nits
350 nits
Contrast Ratio
1000:1
3000:1
DCI-P3 Coverage
90%
90%
HDR
HDR400
HDR400

Performance

Refresh Rate
180 Hz
60 Hz
Response Time
1.0 ms
4.0 ms
Input Lag
5 ms
9 ms

Physical

Weight
4.5 kg
7.5 kg

Frequently asked questions

Is the S3225QC Monitor worth $70 more than the Nitro XV271U Monitor?

It depends on your needs. The S3225QC Monitor scores 70 overall vs 62 for the Nitro XV271U Monitor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the Nitro XV271U Monitor offers better value.

Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the Nitro XV271U Monitor or S3225QC Monitor?

The Nitro XV271U Monitor delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The Nitro XV271U Monitor provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the S3225QC Monitor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.

Can the S3225QC Monitor handle 4K gaming?

The S3225QC Monitor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the Nitro XV271U Monitor is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.

Which should I buy, the Nitro XV271U Monitor or S3225QC Monitor?

Choose the Nitro XV271U Monitor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the S3225QC Monitor if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.

Related comparisons