62

S3225QC Monitor

VA · 32" · 4K · 60Hz · 4ms

$300

MSRP

72

U2725QE Monitor

IPS Black · 27" · 4K · 120Hz · 5ms

$520

MSRP

Our verdict

The U2725QE Monitor takes the performance lead with a 16% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.

However, the S3225QC Monitor tells a compelling value story. At $300 versus the U2725QE Monitor's $520 price tag, it costs 73% less while delivering performance that's only 16% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.

Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the S3225QC Monitor is the smarter purchase. The U2725QE Monitor only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.

Performance winner

U2725QE Monitor

16% faster overall

Best value for money

S3225QC Monitor

22% better value per dollar

S3225QC Monitor best for

Value for money

22% better value per dollar

Connectivity

HDMI
2× HDMI 2.1
1× HDMI 2.1
USB-C
1× USB-C (65W PD)
1× USB-C (140W PD)

Display

Panel Type
VA
IPS Black
Screen Size
32"
27"
Resolution
3840×2160
3840×2160
Pixel Density
138 PPI
163 PPI

Image Quality

Peak Brightness
350 nits
450 nits
Contrast Ratio
3000:1
2000:1
DCI-P3 Coverage
90%
98%
HDR
HDR400
HDR400

Performance

Refresh Rate
60 Hz
120 Hz
Response Time
4.0 ms
5.0 ms
Input Lag
9 ms
8 ms

Physical

Weight
7.5 kg
6.5 kg

Frequently asked questions

Is the U2725QE Monitor worth $220 more than the S3225QC Monitor?

It depends on your needs. The U2725QE Monitor scores 72 overall vs 62 for the S3225QC Monitor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the S3225QC Monitor offers better value.

Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the S3225QC Monitor or U2725QE Monitor?

The U2725QE Monitor delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The U2725QE Monitor provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the S3225QC Monitor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.

Can the S3225QC Monitor handle 4K gaming?

The S3225QC Monitor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the U2725QE Monitor is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.

Which should I buy, the S3225QC Monitor or U2725QE Monitor?

Choose the S3225QC Monitor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the U2725QE Monitor if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.

Related comparisons