68

ProArt PA279CRV Monitor

IPS · 27" · 4K · 60Hz · 5ms

$450

MSRP

62

S3225QC Monitor

VA · 32" · 4K · 60Hz · 4ms

$300

MSRP

Our verdict

The ProArt PA279CRV Monitor takes the performance lead with a 10% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.

However, the S3225QC Monitor tells a compelling value story. At $300 versus the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor's $450 price tag, it costs 50% less while delivering performance that's only 10% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.

Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the S3225QC Monitor is the smarter purchase. The ProArt PA279CRV Monitor only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.

Performance winner

ProArt PA279CRV Monitor

10% faster overall

Best value for money

S3225QC Monitor

19% better value per dollar

ProArt PA279CRV Monitor best for

Power efficiency

10% faster overall

Connectivity

HDMI
1× HDMI 2.0
2× HDMI 2.1
USB-C
1× USB-C (96W PD)
1× USB-C (65W PD)

Display

Panel Type
IPS
VA
Screen Size
27"
32"
Resolution
3840×2160
3840×2160
Pixel Density
163 PPI
138 PPI

Image Quality

Peak Brightness
400 nits
350 nits
Contrast Ratio
1000:1
3000:1
DCI-P3 Coverage
99%
90%
HDR
HDR400
HDR400

Performance

Refresh Rate
60 Hz
60 Hz
Response Time
5.0 ms
4.0 ms
Input Lag
10 ms
9 ms

Physical

Weight
6.8 kg
7.5 kg

Frequently asked questions

Is the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor worth $150 more than the S3225QC Monitor?

It depends on your needs. The ProArt PA279CRV Monitor scores 68 overall vs 62 for the S3225QC Monitor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the S3225QC Monitor offers better value.

Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor or S3225QC Monitor?

The ProArt PA279CRV Monitor delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The ProArt PA279CRV Monitor provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the S3225QC Monitor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.

Can the S3225QC Monitor handle 4K gaming?

The S3225QC Monitor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.

Which should I buy, the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor or S3225QC Monitor?

Choose the S3225QC Monitor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.

Related comparisons