ROG Swift PG27UCDM
QD-OLED · 27" · 4K · 240Hz · 0.03ms
MSRP
S3225QC Monitor
VA · 32" · 4K · 60Hz · 4ms
MSRP
Our verdict
The ROG Swift PG27UCDM takes the performance lead with a 48% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.
However, the S3225QC Monitor tells a compelling value story. At $300 versus the ROG Swift PG27UCDM's $1000 price tag, it costs 233% less while delivering performance that's only 48% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.
Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the S3225QC Monitor is the smarter purchase. The ROG Swift PG27UCDM only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.
Performance winner
ROG Swift PG27UCDM
48% faster overall
Best value for money
S3225QC Monitor
26% better value per dollar
ROG Swift PG27UCDM best for
Power efficiency
48% faster overall
Connectivity
Display
Image Quality
Performance
Physical
Frequently asked questions
Is the ROG Swift PG27UCDM worth $700 more than the S3225QC Monitor?
It depends on your needs. The ROG Swift PG27UCDM scores 92 overall vs 62 for the S3225QC Monitor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the S3225QC Monitor offers better value.
Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the ROG Swift PG27UCDM or S3225QC Monitor?
The ROG Swift PG27UCDM delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The ROG Swift PG27UCDM provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the S3225QC Monitor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.
Can the S3225QC Monitor handle 4K gaming?
The S3225QC Monitor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the ROG Swift PG27UCDM is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.
Which should I buy, the ROG Swift PG27UCDM or S3225QC Monitor?
Choose the S3225QC Monitor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the ROG Swift PG27UCDM if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.
Related comparisons
ROG Swift PG27UCDM VS ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor
Score 92 VS 92
S3225QC Monitor VS ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor
Score 62 VS 92
ROG Swift PG27UCDM VS MPG 321URX
Score 92 VS 92
S3225QC Monitor VS MPG 321URX
Score 62 VS 92
ROG Swift PG27UCDM VS Odyssey OLED G8 32"
Score 92 VS 91
S3225QC Monitor VS Odyssey OLED G8 32"
Score 62 VS 91
ROG Swift PG27UCDM VS Alienware AW3225QF Monitor
Score 92 VS 93
S3225QC Monitor VS Alienware AW3225QF Monitor
Score 62 VS 93