76

M27Q3 Monitor

IPS · 27" · 1440p · 320Hz · 0.5ms

$270

MSRP

92

MPG 321URX

QD-OLED · 32" · 4K · 240Hz · 0.03ms

$900

MSRP

Our verdict

The MPG 321URX takes the performance lead with a 21% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.

However, the M27Q3 Monitor tells a compelling value story. At $270 versus the MPG 321URX's $900 price tag, it costs 233% less while delivering performance that's only 21% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.

Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the M27Q3 Monitor is the smarter purchase. The MPG 321URX only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.

Performance winner

MPG 321URX

21% faster overall

Best value for money

M27Q3 Monitor

21% better value per dollar

M27Q3 Monitor best for

Value for money

21% better value per dollar

Connectivity

HDMI
2× HDMI 2.0
2× HDMI 2.1
USB-C
None
1× USB-C (15W)

Display

Panel Type
IPS
QD-OLED
Screen Size
27"
32"
Resolution
2560×1440
3840×2160
Pixel Density
109 PPI
138 PPI

Image Quality

Peak Brightness
350 nits
1000 nits
Contrast Ratio
1000:1
Infinite
DCI-P3 Coverage
90%
99%
HDR
HDR400
HDR True Black 400

Performance

Refresh Rate
320 Hz
240 Hz
Response Time
0.5 ms
0.03 ms
Input Lag
4 ms
3 ms

Physical

Weight
4.8 kg
6.8 kg

Frequently asked questions

Is the MPG 321URX worth $630 more than the M27Q3 Monitor?

It depends on your needs. The MPG 321URX scores 92 overall vs 76 for the M27Q3 Monitor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the M27Q3 Monitor offers better value.

Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the M27Q3 Monitor or MPG 321URX?

The MPG 321URX delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The MPG 321URX provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the M27Q3 Monitor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.

Can the M27Q3 Monitor handle 4K gaming?

The M27Q3 Monitor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the MPG 321URX is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.

Which should I buy, the M27Q3 Monitor or MPG 321URX?

Choose the M27Q3 Monitor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the MPG 321URX if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.

Related comparisons