U2725QE Monitor
IPS Black · 27" · 4K · 120Hz · 5ms
MSRP
MPG 321URX
QD-OLED · 32" · 4K · 240Hz · 0.03ms
MSRP
Our verdict
The MPG 321URX takes the performance lead with a 28% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.
However, the MPG 321URX tells a compelling value story. At $900 versus the U2725QE Monitor's $520 price tag, it costs $380 less while delivering performance that's only 28% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.
Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the MPG 321URX is the smarter purchase. The U2725QE Monitor only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.
Performance winner
MPG 321URX
28% faster overall
Best value for money
MPG 321URX
6% better value per dollar
U2725QE Monitor best for
Value for money
6% better value per dollar
Connectivity
Display
Image Quality
Performance
Physical
Frequently asked questions
Is the MPG 321URX worth $380 more than the U2725QE Monitor?
It depends on your needs. The MPG 321URX scores 92 overall vs 72 for the U2725QE Monitor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the U2725QE Monitor offers better value.
Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the U2725QE Monitor or MPG 321URX?
The MPG 321URX delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The MPG 321URX provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the U2725QE Monitor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.
Can the U2725QE Monitor handle 4K gaming?
The U2725QE Monitor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the MPG 321URX is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.
Which should I buy, the U2725QE Monitor or MPG 321URX?
Choose the U2725QE Monitor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the MPG 321URX if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.
Related comparisons
U2725QE Monitor VS M27UP Monitor
Score 72 VS 72
MPG 321URX VS M27UP Monitor
Score 92 VS 72
U2725QE Monitor VS G274QPF-QD Monitor
Score 72 VS 72
MPG 321URX VS G274QPF-QD Monitor
Score 92 VS 72
U2725QE Monitor VS PD2706UA Monitor
Score 72 VS 70
MPG 321URX VS PD2706UA Monitor
Score 92 VS 70
U2725QE Monitor VS Nitro XV271U Monitor
Score 72 VS 70
MPG 321URX VS Nitro XV271U Monitor
Score 92 VS 70