88

Core Ultra 9 285K Processor

Arrow Lake · 24C/24T · LGA 1851

$589

MSRP

60

M3 Processor

Apple Silicon · 8C/8T

$599

MSRP

Our verdict

The Core Ultra 9 285K Processor takes the performance lead with a 47% higher overall score, driven by its 24 shader cores, 36 MB of memory, and 5,700 MHz TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 126% more frames per second across demanding titles like Counter-Strike 2 1080p and Cyberpunk 2077 1080p.

However, the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor tells a compelling value story. At $589 versus the M3 Processor's $599 price tag, it costs 2% less while delivering performance that's only 47% behind. Its 36 MB of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.

Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor is the smarter purchase. The M3 Processor only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.

Performance winner

Core Ultra 9 285K Processor

47% faster overall

Best value for money

Core Ultra 9 285K Processor

3% better value per dollar

Core Ultra 9 285K Processor best for

Raw performance

47% faster overall

Memory

Max memory
192 GB
32 GB
Memory type
DDR5-5600
LPDDR5x-6400
Memory channels
2
Unified

Performance

Cores
24
8
P-cores
8
4
E-cores
16
4
Threads
24
8
Base clock
3,700 MHz
2,700 MHz
Boost clock
5,700 MHz
4,100 MHz
L2 cache
36 MB
16 MB
L3 cache
36 MB
0 MB
Process
10 nm
3 nm
Transistors
N/A
N/A

platform

Socket
LGA 1851
SoC
PCIe
PCIe 5.0
Integrated
PCIe lanes
20
0
Integrated graphics
Intel Arc
Apple GPU 10-core

Power

TDP
125W
22W
Max turbo power
250W
22W

Gaming benchmarks (avg FPS at 1080p)

Counter-Strike 2
375 fps
165 fps
Cyberpunk 2077
158 fps
72 fps
Hogwarts Legacy
138 fps
62 fps
Spider-Man 2
148 fps
68 fps
Starfield
108 fps
45 fps

Synthetic & compute benchmarks

Blender BMW
45 seconds
138 seconds
Cinebench 2024 Multi-Core
1,650 pts
520 pts
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
21,000 pts
8,800 pts
Handbrake 4K Encode
90 seconds
265 seconds
7-Zip Compression
145,000 MIPS
42,000 MIPS
Adobe Premiere Pro Export
35 seconds
92 seconds
Cinebench 2024 Single-Core
140 pts
105 pts
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
3,200 pts
2,900 pts

Frequently asked questions

Is the M3 Processor worth $10 more than the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor?

It depends on your needs. The M3 Processor scores 88 overall vs 60 for the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor offers better value.

Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor or M3 Processor?

The Core Ultra 9 285K Processor delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The Core Ultra 9 285K Processor provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the M3 Processor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.

Can the M3 Processor handle 4K gaming?

The M3 Processor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.

Which should I buy, the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor or M3 Processor?

Choose the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the M3 Processor if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.

Related comparisons

Pair with a graphics card

See our GPU rankings →