87

Core i9-14900KS Processor

Raptor Lake Refresh · 24C/32T · LGA 1700

$689

MSRP

88

Core Ultra 9 285K Processor

Arrow Lake · 24C/24T · LGA 1851

$589

MSRP

Our verdict

The Core Ultra 9 285K Processor takes the performance lead with a 1% higher overall score, driven by its 24 shader cores, 36 MB of memory, and 5,700 MHz TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 4% more frames per second across demanding titles like Counter-Strike 2 1080p and Cyberpunk 2077 1080p.

However, the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor tells a compelling value story. At $589 versus the Core i9-14900KS Processor's $689 price tag, it costs 17% less while delivering performance that's only 1% behind. Its 36 MB of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.

Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor is the smarter purchase. The Core i9-14900KS Processor only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.

Performance winner

Core Ultra 9 285K Processor

1% faster overall

Best value for money

Core Ultra 9 285K Processor

24% better value per dollar

Core i9-14900KS Processor best for

Raw performance

24% better value per dollar

Memory

Max memory
192 GB
192 GB
Memory type
DDR5-5600
DDR5-5600
Memory channels
2
2

Performance

Cores
24
24
P-cores
8
8
E-cores
16
16
Threads
32
24
Base clock
3,200 MHz
3,700 MHz
Boost clock
6,200 MHz
5,700 MHz
L2 cache
32 MB
36 MB
L3 cache
36 MB
36 MB
Process
10 nm
10 nm
Transistors
N/A
N/A

platform

Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1851
PCIe
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
PCIe lanes
20
20
Integrated graphics
Intel UHD 770
Intel Arc

Power

TDP
150W
125W
Max turbo power
253W
250W

Gaming benchmarks (avg FPS at 1080p)

Counter-Strike 2
385 fps
375 fps
Cyberpunk 2077
165 fps
158 fps
Hogwarts Legacy
142 fps
138 fps
Spider-Man 2
155 fps
148 fps
Starfield
112 fps
108 fps

Synthetic & compute benchmarks

Blender BMW
44 seconds
45 seconds
Cinebench 2024 Multi-Core
1,680 pts
1,650 pts
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
21,200 pts
21,000 pts
Handbrake 4K Encode
88 seconds
90 seconds
7-Zip Compression
148,000 MIPS
145,000 MIPS
Adobe Premiere Pro Export
33 seconds
35 seconds
Cinebench 2024 Single-Core
135 pts
140 pts
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
3,100 pts
3,200 pts

Frequently asked questions

Is the Core i9-14900KS Processor worth $100 more than the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor?

It depends on your needs. The Core i9-14900KS Processor scores 88 overall vs 87 for the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor offers better value.

Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the Core i9-14900KS Processor or Core Ultra 9 285K Processor?

The Core Ultra 9 285K Processor delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The Core Ultra 9 285K Processor provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the Core i9-14900KS Processor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.

Can the Core i9-14900KS Processor handle 4K gaming?

The Core i9-14900KS Processor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.

Which should I buy, the Core i9-14900KS Processor or Core Ultra 9 285K Processor?

Choose the Core Ultra 9 285K Processor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the Core i9-14900KS Processor if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.

Related comparisons

Pair with a graphics card

See our GPU rankings →