Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit
DDR5 · 5600MHz · CL36 · 2x8GB · DIMM
MSRP
Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory
DDR4 · 3200MHz · CL22 · 1x16GB · SODIMM
MSRP
Our verdict
The Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit takes the performance lead with a 10% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 25% more frames per second across demanding titles like Counter-Strike 2 and F1 2024.
However, the Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory tells a compelling value story. At $25 versus the Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit's $45 price tag, it costs 80% less while delivering performance that's only 10% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.
Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory is the smarter purchase. The Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.
Performance winner
Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit
10% faster overall
Best value for money
Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory
9% better value per dollar
Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit best for
Raw performance
10% faster overall
features
Memory
Performance
Physical
Power
value
Gaming benchmarks (avg FPS at 1440p ultra)
Synthetic & compute benchmarks
Frequently asked questions
Is the Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit worth $20 more than the Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory?
It depends on your needs. The Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit scores 55 overall vs 50 for the Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory offers better value.
Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit or Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory?
The Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.
Can the Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory handle 4K gaming?
The Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.
Which should I buy, the Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit or Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory?
Choose the Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.
Related comparisons
Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit VS Crucial DDR5-5600 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory
Score 55 VS 56
Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory VS Crucial DDR5-5600 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory
Score 50 VS 56
Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit VS Samsung DDR5-5600 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory
Score 55 VS 57
Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory VS Samsung DDR5-5600 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory
Score 50 VS 57
Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit VS Crucial DDR5-4800 32GB Memory Kit
Score 55 VS 58
Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory VS Crucial DDR5-4800 32GB Memory Kit
Score 50 VS 58
Fury Beast DDR5-5600 16GB Memory Kit VS Crucial DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory
Score 55 VS 52
Samsung DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory VS Crucial DDR4-3200 16GB SODIMM Laptop Memory
Score 50 VS 52