iPhone 16 Pro Max VS iPhone 17 Pro

88

iPhone 16 Pro Max

6.9-inch OLED 120Hz · A18 Pro · 4685mAh · 48MP · IP68

$1199

MSRP

93

iPhone 17 Pro

6.3-inch OLED 120Hz · A19 Pro · 4252mAh · 48MP · IP68

$1099

MSRP

$1199

MSRP

Check price

$1099

MSRP

Check price

Our verdict

The iPhone 17 Pro takes the performance lead, 6% ahead overall, driven by its A19 Pro and an AnTuTu score of 2,538,751.

On value the iPhone 17 Pro stands out at $1099, pairing a 48MP main camera with a 4252mAh battery.

For most buyers the iPhone 17 Pro is the smarter choice.

Performance winner

iPhone 17 Pro

6% faster overall

Best value for money

iPhone 17 Pro

6% better value per dollar

iPhone 16 Pro Max best for

Value for money

6% better value per dollar

Overview

The iPhone 17 Pro comes out ahead overall, scoring 93 to the iPhone 16 Pro Max's 88. Priced at $1099 against $1199, the choice between them is as much about budget as specs, and each phone leans toward a slightly different buyer.

Performance

For raw speed the iPhone 17 Pro takes the lead, with an AnTuTu score of 2,538,751 against 1,750,331, driven by its A19 Pro. Both feel quick in everyday use, but the gap shows up in demanding games and heavy multitasking where the faster chip pulls ahead.

Cameras

The iPhone 16 Pro Max pairs a 48MP main camera with 5x optical zoom and a 12MP front sensor. The iPhone 17 Pro answers with 48MP, 4x zoom and a 18MP selfie camera. The iPhone 16 Pro Max reaches further with its longer optical zoom, which helps for portraits and distant subjects.

Battery and charging

Battery favours the iPhone 16 Pro Max, with a 4685mAh cell against 4252mAh. For refills the iPhone 16 Pro Max is quickest at , spending less time tied to a charger.

Display

Both use high refresh rate OLED screens. The iPhone 16 Pro Max measures 6.9" and peaks at 2000 nits, while the iPhone 17 Pro is 6.3" and reaches 3000 nits. Screen size and outright brightness are where they separate most.

Which should you buy

Overall the iPhone 17 Pro is the one we would steer most buyers toward. Consider the iPhone 16 Pro Max instead if longer battery life matters more to you.

battery

Battery
4685mAh
4252mAh
Wireless charging
25W
25W

camera

Main camera
48MP
48MP
Optical zoom
5x
4x
Ultrawide
48MP
48MP
Front camera
12MP
18MP
Max video
4K120
4K120

display

Display size
6.9"
6.3"
Display type
OLED
OLED
Refresh rate
120Hz
120Hz
Peak brightness
2000 nits
3000 nits
Resolution
2868x1320
2622x1206

Performance

Chipset
A18 Pro
A19 Pro
RAM
8GB
12GB
Storage
256GB
256GB

Physical

Weight
227g
206g
Thickness
8.25mm
8.75mm
Water resistance
IP68
IP68

Synthetic & compute benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
8,789 pts
10,688 pts
AnTuTu v11
1,750,331 pts
2,538,751 pts

Frequently asked questions

Is the iPhone 16 Pro Max better than the iPhone 17 Pro?

Overall the iPhone 17 Pro scores 93 out of 100 against the iPhone 16 Pro Max's 88, so it edges ahead on our combined rating. Even so, the two are close enough that price, size and your preferred ecosystem should also guide the decision.

Which has the better camera, the iPhone 16 Pro Max or the iPhone 17 Pro?

The iPhone 16 Pro Max has the stronger camera on paper, leading with a 48MP main sensor and 5x optical zoom. Both take excellent photos, but the iPhone 16 Pro Max offers more reach and flexibility.

Which has better battery life, the iPhone 16 Pro Max or the iPhone 17 Pro?

The iPhone 16 Pro Max carries the larger 4685mAh battery against 4252mAh, and the iPhone 16 Pro Max charges fastest at . For heavy all-day use the iPhone 16 Pro Max is the safer bet.

Which is faster, the iPhone 16 Pro Max or the iPhone 17 Pro?

In benchmarks the iPhone 17 Pro is quicker, posting an AnTuTu score of 2,538,751 against 1,750,331 thanks to its A19 Pro. Both handle everyday tasks smoothly, but the iPhone 17 Pro pulls ahead in demanding games.

Should I buy the iPhone 16 Pro Max or the iPhone 17 Pro?

For most buyers the iPhone 17 Pro is the smarter pick, balancing performance, features and price. Choose the iPhone 16 Pro Max if longer battery life is your priority.

Related comparisons