Galaxy A56 VS iPhone 17
Galaxy A56
6.7-inch Super AMOLED 120Hz · Exynos 1580 · 5000mAh · 50MP · IP67
MSRP
iPhone 17
6.3-inch OLED 120Hz · A19 · 3692mAh · 48MP · IP68
MSRP
Our verdict
The iPhone 17 takes the performance lead, 17% ahead overall, driven by its A19 and an AnTuTu score of 1,950,000.
On value the Galaxy A56 stands out at $499, pairing a 50MP main camera with a 5000mAh battery.
For most buyers the Galaxy A56 is the smarter choice. One runs iOS and the other Android, so your existing apps, watch and ecosystem may matter more than the spec differences.
Performance winner
iPhone 17
17% faster overall
Best value for money
Galaxy A56
13% better value per dollar
Galaxy A56 best for
Value for money
13% better value per dollar
Overview
The iPhone 17 comes out ahead overall, scoring 89 to the Galaxy A56's 76. Priced at $799 against $499, the choice between them is as much about budget as specs, and each phone leans toward a slightly different buyer.
Performance
For raw speed the iPhone 17 takes the lead, with an AnTuTu score of 1,950,000 against 820,000, driven by its A19. Both feel quick in everyday use, but the gap shows up in demanding games and heavy multitasking where the faster chip pulls ahead.
Cameras
The Galaxy A56 pairs a 50MP main camera with optical zoom and a 12MP front sensor. The iPhone 17 answers with 48MP, zoom and a 18MP selfie camera.
Battery and charging
Battery favours the Galaxy A56, with a 5000mAh cell against 3692mAh. For refills the Galaxy A56 is quickest at 45W, spending less time tied to a charger.
Display
Both use high refresh rate OLED screens. The Galaxy A56 measures 6.7" and peaks at 1900 nits, while the iPhone 17 is 6.3" and reaches 3000 nits. Screen size and outright brightness are where they separate most.
Which should you buy
Overall the Galaxy A56 is the one we would steer most buyers toward. One runs iOS and the other Android, so your existing apps, watch and ecosystem may matter more than the spec differences. Consider the iPhone 17 instead if raw performance matters more to you.
battery
camera
display
Performance
Physical
Synthetic & compute benchmarks
Frequently asked questions
Is the Galaxy A56 better than the iPhone 17?
Overall the iPhone 17 scores 89 out of 100 against the Galaxy A56's 76, so it edges ahead on our combined rating. Even so, the two are close enough that price, size and your preferred ecosystem should also guide the decision.
Which has the better camera, the Galaxy A56 or the iPhone 17?
The Galaxy A56 has the stronger camera on paper, leading with a 50MP main sensor and optical zoom. Both take excellent photos, but the Galaxy A56 offers more reach and flexibility.
Which has better battery life, the Galaxy A56 or the iPhone 17?
The Galaxy A56 carries the larger 5000mAh battery against 3692mAh, and the Galaxy A56 charges fastest at 45W. For heavy all-day use the Galaxy A56 is the safer bet.
Which is faster, the Galaxy A56 or the iPhone 17?
In benchmarks the iPhone 17 is quicker, posting an AnTuTu score of 1,950,000 against 820,000 thanks to its A19. Both handle everyday tasks smoothly, but the iPhone 17 pulls ahead in demanding games.
Should I buy the Galaxy A56 or the iPhone 17?
For most buyers the Galaxy A56 is the smarter pick, balancing performance, features and price. One runs iOS and the other Android, so your existing apps, watch and ecosystem may matter more than the spec differences. Choose the iPhone 17 if raw performance is your priority.
Related comparisons
Galaxy A56 VS Pixel 9a
Score 76 VS 82
iPhone 17 VS Pixel 9a
Score 89 VS 82
Galaxy A56 VS iPhone 16
Score 76 VS 84
iPhone 17 VS iPhone 16
Score 89 VS 84
Galaxy A56 VS Galaxy Z Flip 7
Score 76 VS 84
iPhone 17 VS Galaxy Z Flip 7
Score 89 VS 84
Galaxy A56 VS iPhone 15 Pro Max
Score 76 VS 85
iPhone 17 VS iPhone 15 Pro Max
Score 89 VS 85