27UK850-W Monitor
IPS · 27" · 4K · 60Hz · 5ms
MSRP
MPG 321URX
QD-OLED · 32" · 4K · 240Hz · 0.03ms
MSRP
Our verdict
The MPG 321URX takes the performance lead with a 44% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.
However, the 27UK850-W Monitor tells a compelling value story. At $350 versus the MPG 321URX's $900 price tag, it costs 157% less while delivering performance that's only 44% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.
Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the 27UK850-W Monitor is the smarter purchase. The MPG 321URX only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.
Performance winner
MPG 321URX
44% faster overall
Best value for money
27UK850-W Monitor
5% better value per dollar
27UK850-W Monitor best for
Value for money
5% better value per dollar
Connectivity
Display
Image Quality
Performance
Physical
Frequently asked questions
Is the MPG 321URX worth $550 more than the 27UK850-W Monitor?
It depends on your needs. The MPG 321URX scores 92 overall vs 64 for the 27UK850-W Monitor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the 27UK850-W Monitor offers better value.
Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the 27UK850-W Monitor or MPG 321URX?
The MPG 321URX delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The MPG 321URX provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the 27UK850-W Monitor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.
Can the 27UK850-W Monitor handle 4K gaming?
The 27UK850-W Monitor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the MPG 321URX is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.
Which should I buy, the 27UK850-W Monitor or MPG 321URX?
Choose the 27UK850-W Monitor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the MPG 321URX if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.
Related comparisons
27UK850-W Monitor VS 27UQ850-W Monitor
Score 64 VS 65
MPG 321URX VS 27UQ850-W Monitor
Score 92 VS 65
27UK850-W Monitor VS S3225QC Monitor
Score 64 VS 62
MPG 321URX VS S3225QC Monitor
Score 92 VS 62
27UK850-W Monitor VS ProArt PA279CRV Monitor
Score 64 VS 68
MPG 321URX VS ProArt PA279CRV Monitor
Score 92 VS 68
27UK850-W Monitor VS S2725DS Monitor
Score 64 VS 60
MPG 321URX VS S2725DS Monitor
Score 92 VS 60