ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor
W-OLED · 32" · 4K · 240Hz · 0.03ms
MSRP
S2725DS Monitor
IPS · 27" · 1440p · 100Hz · 4ms
MSRP
Our verdict
The ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor takes the performance lead with a 53% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.
However, the S2725DS Monitor tells a compelling value story. At $200 versus the ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor's $1100 price tag, it costs 450% less while delivering performance that's only 53% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.
Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the S2725DS Monitor is the smarter purchase. The ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.
Performance winner
ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor
53% faster overall
Best value for money
S2725DS Monitor
39% better value per dollar
ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor best for
Power efficiency
53% faster overall
Connectivity
Display
Image Quality
Performance
Physical
Frequently asked questions
Is the ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor worth $900 more than the S2725DS Monitor?
It depends on your needs. The ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor scores 92 overall vs 60 for the S2725DS Monitor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the S2725DS Monitor offers better value.
Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor or S2725DS Monitor?
The ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the S2725DS Monitor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.
Can the S2725DS Monitor handle 4K gaming?
The S2725DS Monitor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.
Which should I buy, the ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor or S2725DS Monitor?
Choose the S2725DS Monitor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.
Related comparisons
ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor VS MPG 321URX
Score 92 VS 92
S2725DS Monitor VS MPG 321URX
Score 60 VS 92
ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor VS ROG Swift PG27UCDM
Score 92 VS 92
S2725DS Monitor VS ROG Swift PG27UCDM
Score 60 VS 92
ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor VS Odyssey OLED G8 32"
Score 92 VS 91
S2725DS Monitor VS Odyssey OLED G8 32"
Score 60 VS 91
ROG Strix XG32UCWMG Monitor VS Alienware AW3225QF Monitor
Score 92 VS 93
S2725DS Monitor VS Alienware AW3225QF Monitor
Score 60 VS 93