68

ProArt PA279CRV Monitor

IPS · 27" · 4K · 60Hz · 5ms

$450

MSRP

90

FO32U2 Monitor

QD-OLED · 32" · 4K · 240Hz · 0.03ms

$850

MSRP

Our verdict

The FO32U2 Monitor takes the performance lead with a 32% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.

However, the FO32U2 Monitor tells a compelling value story. At $850 versus the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor's $450 price tag, it costs $400 less while delivering performance that's only 32% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.

Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the FO32U2 Monitor is the smarter purchase. The ProArt PA279CRV Monitor only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.

Performance winner

FO32U2 Monitor

32% faster overall

Best value for money

FO32U2 Monitor

5% better value per dollar

ProArt PA279CRV Monitor best for

Value for money

5% better value per dollar

Connectivity

HDMI
1× HDMI 2.0
2× HDMI 2.1
USB-C
1× USB-C (96W PD)
1× USB-C (18W)

Display

Panel Type
IPS
QD-OLED
Screen Size
27"
32"
Resolution
3840×2160
3840×2160
Pixel Density
163 PPI
138 PPI

Image Quality

Peak Brightness
400 nits
1000 nits
Contrast Ratio
1000:1
Infinite
DCI-P3 Coverage
99%
99%
HDR
HDR400
HDR True Black 400

Performance

Refresh Rate
60 Hz
240 Hz
Response Time
5.0 ms
0.03 ms
Input Lag
10 ms
3 ms

Physical

Weight
6.8 kg
6.3 kg

Frequently asked questions

Is the FO32U2 Monitor worth $400 more than the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor?

It depends on your needs. The FO32U2 Monitor scores 90 overall vs 68 for the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor offers better value.

Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor or FO32U2 Monitor?

The FO32U2 Monitor delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The FO32U2 Monitor provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.

Can the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor handle 4K gaming?

The ProArt PA279CRV Monitor can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the FO32U2 Monitor is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.

Which should I buy, the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor or FO32U2 Monitor?

Choose the ProArt PA279CRV Monitor if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the FO32U2 Monitor if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.

Related comparisons