Ear (a) Earbuds
In-ear TWS · ANC · 9.5h/42.5h · LDAC · BT 5.3
MSRP
WF-1000XM6 Earbuds
In-ear TWS · ANC · 8h/24h · LDAC · BT 5.3
MSRP
Our verdict
The WF-1000XM6 Earbuds takes the performance lead with a 33% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.
However, the Ear (a) Earbuds tells a compelling value story. At $60 versus the WF-1000XM6 Earbuds's $280 price tag, it costs 367% less while delivering performance that's only 33% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.
Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the Ear (a) Earbuds is the smarter purchase. The WF-1000XM6 Earbuds only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.
Performance winner
WF-1000XM6 Earbuds
33% faster overall
Best value for money
Ear (a) Earbuds
29% better value per dollar
Ear (a) Earbuds best for
Power efficiency
29% better value per dollar
Audio
Battery
Comfort
Connectivity
Noise Cancellation
Frequently asked questions
Is the WF-1000XM6 Earbuds worth $220 more than the Ear (a) Earbuds?
It depends on your needs. The WF-1000XM6 Earbuds scores 88 overall vs 66 for the Ear (a) Earbuds. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the Ear (a) Earbuds offers better value.
Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the Ear (a) Earbuds or WF-1000XM6 Earbuds?
The WF-1000XM6 Earbuds delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The WF-1000XM6 Earbuds provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the Ear (a) Earbuds still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.
Can the Ear (a) Earbuds handle 4K gaming?
The Ear (a) Earbuds can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the WF-1000XM6 Earbuds is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.
Which should I buy, the Ear (a) Earbuds or WF-1000XM6 Earbuds?
Choose the Ear (a) Earbuds if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the WF-1000XM6 Earbuds if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.
Related comparisons
Ear (a) Earbuds VS Tune 770NC Headphones
Score 66 VS 68
WF-1000XM6 Earbuds VS Tune 770NC Headphones
Score 88 VS 68
Ear (a) Earbuds VS WF-C710N Earbuds
Score 66 VS 68
WF-1000XM6 Earbuds VS WF-C710N Earbuds
Score 88 VS 68
Ear (a) Earbuds VS Galaxy Buds FE Earbuds
Score 66 VS 64
WF-1000XM6 Earbuds VS Galaxy Buds FE Earbuds
Score 88 VS 64
Ear (a) Earbuds VS Tune Beam Earbuds
Score 66 VS 62
WF-1000XM6 Earbuds VS Tune Beam Earbuds
Score 88 VS 62