92

QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones

Over-ear · ANC · 24h · aptX Adaptive · BT 5.3

$430

MSRP

88

WF-1000XM6 Earbuds

In-ear TWS · ANC · 8h/24h · LDAC · BT 5.3

$280

MSRP

Our verdict

The QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones takes the performance lead with a 5% higher overall score, driven by its more shader cores, more of memory, and higher TFLOPS of compute power. In gaming benchmarks at 1440p, it delivers roughly 0% more frames per second across demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Alan Wake 2.

However, the WF-1000XM6 Earbuds tells a compelling value story. At $280 versus the QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones's $430 price tag, it costs 54% less while delivering performance that's only 5% behind. Its of memory is still more than enough for 1440p and even 4K gaming in most titles.

Our recommendation: for the majority of gamers targeting 1440p or even 4K with upscaling enabled, the WF-1000XM6 Earbuds is the smarter purchase. The QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones only makes sense if you need the absolute maximum performance for native 4K ray tracing, professional 3D rendering, or AI workloads where the extra VRAM and compute power provide a tangible advantage.

Performance winner

QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones

5% faster overall

Best value for money

WF-1000XM6 Earbuds

6% better value per dollar

QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones best for

Raw performance

5% faster overall

Audio

Driver Size
35mm
8.4mm
Frequency Response
20Hz - 20kHz
20Hz - 40kHz
Form Factor
Over-ear
In-ear TWS

Battery

Battery Life (ANC On)
24h
8h
Total with Case
N/A
24h
Fast Charge
15min → 2.5h
3min → 1h

Comfort

Weight
254g
4.8g
IP Rating
None
IPX4
Wireless Charging
No
Yes (Qi)

Connectivity

Bluetooth
5.3
5.3
Codecs
aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC
LDAC, AAC, SBC
Multipoint
Yes (2 devices)
Yes (2 devices)

Noise Cancellation

Active Noise Cancellation
Yes (CustomTune)
Yes (V2+QN3)
Transparency Mode
Yes (Aware)
Yes (Adaptive)

Frequently asked questions

Is the QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones worth $150 more than the WF-1000XM6 Earbuds?

It depends on your needs. The QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones scores 92 overall vs 88 for the WF-1000XM6 Earbuds. If you need the extra performance for demanding tasks, the premium is justified. For most users gaming at 1440p or below, the WF-1000XM6 Earbuds offers better value.

Which GPU is better for 1440p gaming, the QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones or WF-1000XM6 Earbuds?

The QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones delivers higher frame rates at 1440p, but both GPUs handle 1440p gaming well. The QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones provides more headroom for ray tracing and future titles, while the WF-1000XM6 Earbuds still maintains smooth gameplay in current games.

Can the WF-1000XM6 Earbuds handle 4K gaming?

The WF-1000XM6 Earbuds can handle 4K gaming in less demanding titles and with upscaling technologies like DLSS or FSR. For native 4K at ultra settings in demanding games, the QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones is the better choice with its higher performance ceiling.

Which should I buy, the QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones or WF-1000XM6 Earbuds?

Choose the WF-1000XM6 Earbuds if you want the best value for money and primarily game at 1080p or 1440p. Choose the QC Ultra 2nd Gen Headphones if you need maximum performance, play at 4K, or do professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.

Related comparisons