Intel Core i9-13900K Processor

IntelRaptor Lakedesktop

Raptor Lake · 24C/32T · LGA 1700

The Intel Core i9-13900K was the flagship of the original Raptor Lake generation, delivering 24 cores with 32 threads and a 5.8GHz boost clock on LGA 1700. At launch it claimed the single-threaded and multi-threaded performance crown, offering a significant uplift over the previous 12900K. The hybrid architecture with 8 P-cores and 16 E-cores excels in heavily threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation. Gaming performance was among the best at launch, though AMD's Ryzen 7 7800X3D later claimed the gaming crown with its V-Cache technology. Power consumption is aggressive, regularly exceeding 250W under sustained loads, requiring robust cooling solutions. The LGA 1700 platform offers both DDR4 and DDR5 support, giving builders flexibility. At $589, the 13900K has been largely superseded by the 14900K and Arrow Lake options, but it remains a powerful chip for those who already own compatible hardware. Its performance profile closely matches the 14900K in most real-world tasks, making a used or discounted 13900K an excellent value proposition.

82

Overall

87

Performance

55

Value

45

Efficiency

Memory

Max memory192 GB
Memory typeDDR5-5600
Memory channels2

Performance

Cores24
P-cores8
E-cores16
Threads32
Base clock3,000 MHz
Boost clock5,800 MHz
L2 cache32 MB
L3 cache36 MB
Process10 nm
TransistorsN/A billion

Platform

SocketLGA 1700
PCIePCIe 5.0
PCIe lanes20
Integrated graphicsIntel UHD 770

Power

TDP125W
Max turbo power253W

Gaming (1080p)

Counter-Strike 2
370 fps
Cyberpunk 2077
158 fps
Hogwarts Legacy
135 fps
Spider-Man 2
148 fps
Starfield
105 fps

Multi-Core

Blender BMW
48 seconds
Cinebench 2024 Multi-Core
1,550 pts
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
19,500 pts
Handbrake 4K Encode
95 seconds

Productivity

7-Zip Compression
138,000 MIPS
Adobe Premiere Pro Export
38 seconds

Single-Core

Cinebench 2024 Single-Core
128 pts
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2,950 pts

Use case fit

Streaming
88/100
Gaming
72/100

Compare with